首页> 外文OA文献 >Participation in curbside recycling schemes and its variation with material types
【2h】

Participation in curbside recycling schemes and its variation with material types

机译:参与路边回收计划及其随物料类型的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Local authorities throughout the UK are refining or implementing curbside recycling schemes as they attempt to achieve challenging statutory recycling targets. Despite the importance of curbside schemes there are few published studies that have reported on actual measured levels and frequency of participation by residents, hindering transferability of lessons learned nationally and internationally. This paper reports measurements and analysis over at least four weeks for three different curbside recycling schemes operating in England, with at least 1400 samples in each. It is found that the participation rate is higher in schemes that collect more types of materials. Participation rates of 38%, 49% and 65% were measured for schemes that collected 1, 2 and 3 material types, respectively. The increase appears to be related not only to extra participants setting out the additional materials, but also increased participation for the common materials. It is found that for one scheme, more households tend to set out plastics and cans compared to newspapers.
机译:英国各地的地方政府在努力实现具有挑战性的法定回收目标时,正在完善或实施路边回收计划。尽管路边计划很重要,但很少有已发表的研究报告居民实际参与程度和参与程度,这阻碍了在国内和国际上学到的经验教训的可移植性。本文报告了在英格兰运行的三个不同路边回收计划在至少四个星期内的测量和分析,每个计划至少有1400个样本。发现收集更多类型材料的方案中的参与率更高。分别收集了1、2和3种材料类型的计划的参与率测得为38%,49%和65%。人数增加似乎不仅与额外参与者提出了更多材料有关,还与普通材料的参与性增加有关。结果发现,与报纸相比,对于一种方案,更多的家庭倾向于摆放塑料和罐头。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号